All six platforms compared: the table, the trade-offs, and which combination makes sense
Three weeks of platform analysis, brought together in one place. Here is how they stack up and how to think about combining them.
Over the past three weeks I have covered why the platform decision matters more in New Zealand than almost anywhere else, why PIE fund platforms handle FIF differently from direct investing platforms, and what the trade-offs are for each of the six platforms most NZ investors will encounter. This week I am bringing it together in one place.
The comparison table below covers the five criteria that matter: fees, fund access, FIF handling, custody, and tax reporting. After that, six scenarios that map investor profiles to platform combinations. The goal is not to tell you what to do but to give you a framework for making a deliberate decision rather than defaulting to whatever you signed up for first.
The comparison table
A few notes before the table. Fee structures change, so verify current details directly with each provider before making decisions. The FIF handling column reflects whether the platform's default structure handles FIF internally at the fund level or passes the obligation to you directly. Tax reporting reflects whether the platform generates IRD-ready FIF reports automatically.
| Platform | Type | Fees | Fund access | FIF handling | Custody | FIF report | KiwiSaver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InvestNow | PIE | No transaction fees on most funds | Smartshares, Kernel, Milford, Generate + more | Internal — fund pays FIF | NZ regulated | N/A | Yes |
| Kernel | PIE | ~0.25% annual fee, no transaction fees | Kernel index funds only | Internal — fund pays FIF | NZ regulated | N/A | Yes |
| Sharesies | Direct | 0.5% per trade capped at $5 (NZ/AU); subscription for US | NZ, AU, US shares and ETFs | You pay FIF directly if over $50k | NZ regulated | Yes | Yes |
| Hatch | Direct | Flat fee per transaction | US shares and ETFs only | You pay FIF directly if over $50k | DriveWealth (US) | Yes | No |
| Stake | Direct | Subscription + transaction fees | US and AU shares and ETFs | You pay FIF directly if over $50k | US custodian | Partial | No |
| Interactive Brokers | Direct | Low per-trade fees; competitive at scale | Global markets, options, futures, bonds | You pay FIF directly if over $50k | US/global custodian | Manual | No |
Advertisement · 728 × 90Which combination makes sense
Most investors do not need to choose just one platform. The more useful question is what role each platform plays in a portfolio and whether your current setup reflects a deliberate choice or a historical accident. Here are six scenarios that cover most NZ investor profiles.
The questions worth asking about your current setup
If you are already investing and have been for a while, the platform comparison above is less useful than a simple audit of your current position. Here are the four questions I think every NZ investor should be able to answer about their own situation.
What is your KiwiSaver PIR rate, and is it correct? The April 2025 threshold changes mean a significant proportion of investors are on the wrong rate. It takes 60 seconds to check and your provider will not do it for you.
What is your KiwiSaver total annual fee, and how does it compare to low-cost alternatives? A 1% fee difference on a $50,000 balance compounds to more than $130,000 over 30 years. Most people do not know what their fund charges.
What is the combined cost basis of your overseas holdings, and does it exceed $50,000? FIF applies to your total overseas holdings at cost across all platforms. Many investors are over the threshold without realising it.
Are you using the right FIF calculation method? Most investors default to FDR without checking whether CV would produce a lower result in their specific year. The answer changes depending on how your portfolio performed.
That wraps up the four-week platform series. Next week I will move on to portfolio construction: how to think about asset allocation as a NZ investor, what the right split between NZ, Australian and international equities looks like, and why the conventional US-centric advice on this question does not translate directly to our situation.
Portfolio construction for NZ investors: asset allocation, the NZ home bias problem, and how to think about the split between local and global
Why the conventional advice on asset allocation does not translate directly from the US context, what the right split between NZ, Australian and international equities looks like, and how to build a portfolio that is genuinely diversified from here. Free for all subscribers.
Subscribe — it's free